Next: Maximum principle for the
Up: StatMech
Previous: StatMech
1.Derivation of the entropy formula
for the microcanonical ensemble
- 1.
- We first show by straightforward calculation that the phase
volume
of the microcanonical ensemble of a
system upon an infinitesimal variation of energy
and volume
, at fixed particle number
, changes by
 |
(1) |
where
is the equilibrium pressure. The phase volume is
defined by
 |
(2) |
where
is the step function. The Hamilton
of the
-particle system is the sum of the
kinetic energy, the potential energy of interparticle interactions
and the wall potential:
 |
(3) |
For simplicity we assume that the volume has the form of a cube
of side length
, and that the volume is changed by
shifting the position
of the wall facing in
-direction
from
by a small amount
.
The potential of the particles near this
wall is given by
 |
(4) |
where
is the wall potential for a particle at a distance
from the wall, and the sum goes over all particles of the
system. Since
 |
(5) |
is the force on particle
from the wall facing in
-direction, and, by Newton's third law,
 |
(6) |
is the force on that wall from all particles near it, we obtain
for the derivative of the wall potential
 |
(7) |
the microcanonical average of which is related to the pressure
by
 |
(8) |
The partial derivative of
with respect to
yields
 |
(9) |
Since the distribution function
(= probability density in
phase space) for the microcanonical ensemble can be chosen as
 |
(10) |
(by letting the infinitesimal energy spread
go to
zero) the expression on the r. h. s. of eqn. (9) can be
identified as
 |
(11) |
For the total differential of
we thus obtain, using
(8),
The last expression is the desired result eqn. (1).
- 2.
- How do we interpret this result? How can we relate it to
real physical processes?
We recall that the microcanonical ensemble is used to describe
the equilibrium state of a closed system, with a certain
fixed energy
and volume
. If we change this energy and
volume, it is not, of course, a closed system any more. However,
we have in mind that the procedure by which the energy and volume
of the system is changed is such that at any moment the system
can still be described by a microcanonical ensemble, with varying
values of
and
. We call such a process "quasistatic".
Correspondingly, our result (1) expresses the change
of the phase volume of a microcanonical ensemble subject to a
quasistatic process.
If in the procedure energy is transferred to the system only in
the form of mechanical work done against the internal pressure
, i.e. if
 |
(13) |
holds, our result (1) tells us that the phase volume
remains unchanged:
 |
(14) |
Since this implies that no energy is transferred in the form of
heat, the result (14) is referred to as ''adiabatic
invariance of the phase volume''. However, if (13) does not
hold, i.e. if the amount of transferred energy differs from the
mechanical work, we attribute the difference to a transfer of
heat
 |
(15) |
according to the law of energy conservation. (For simplicity we
omit the possibility of energy transfer by electrical or
magnetical work.) Comparison with eqn. (1) leads to
the following relation between heat transfer and change of phase
volume:
 |
(16) |
This result may seem somewhat surprising since in the derivation
of eqn. (1) any consideration of heat is absent.
However, for that derivation it is irrelevant in which way the
energy of the system is changed, if only the process is
quasistatic as defined above. This condition must also hold for a
transfer of heat, which requires that the temperature differences
driving heat flow must be infinitesimal. We know from
thermodynamics that in this case, by the second law of
thermodynamics, we may write
 |
(17) |
where
is the corresponding change of the entropy of the
system, and the thermodynamic temperature
is defined by
 |
(18) |
Combining (16), (17) and (18) we
finally obtain
 |
(19) |
It follows1 from this relation that the entropy
is determined by the phase volume
alone. In other
words,
varies with
and
only via its dependence on
:
 |
(20) |
with some function
. However, this function
cannot be deduced from (19), which is fulfilled for
any differentiable function
:
 |
(21) |
The derivation of relation (20) is the main step in
our derivation of the entropy formula. The function
can
be inferred from the requirement that the entropy is an extensive
quantity, using our knowledge of the function
. A
quantity
is extensive if it can be written as
 |
(22) |
where
is some function of two variables. For ideal gases
can be calculated without great difficulty. It is
found that
is an extensive quantity.
Therefore the desired function
must be given,
apart from constants, by
. This leads to the result
 |
(23) |
Without a proof that
has this property generally, we
have to assume that
is a universal function.
The constant
must be positive since the entropy is
non-negative. Its magnitude fixes the thermodynamic temperature
scale. The additive constant
must be chosen to match the
quantum-mechanical case, which defines the zero of entropy. With
the proper choice of the constants
and
, the entropy
formula (23) becomes
 |
(24) |
with
 |
(25) |
is the semiclassical integrated density of
states of the system. The entropy formula (24) thus has
been derived by interpreting the statistical mechanics result
(1) in terms of thermodynamics processes, taking
thermodynamic laws into account.
Next: Maximum principle for the
Up: StatMech
Previous: StatMech
Klaus Froböse
2002-03-19